Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David L. Morris, Pamela Morris, and v. Ronald Kesselring

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 6, 2010

DAVID L. MORRIS, PAMELA MORRIS, AND RANDY MORRIS, PLAINTIFFS
v.
RONALD KESSELRING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiffs' objections and supporting brief (Docs. 103, 104) to the memorandum and nondispositive order of the Honorable William T. Prince dated October 27, 2010 (Doc. 102), as well as the response of defendants Brady, Kesselring, Rowe, Whitten, and Zumbrum (Doc. 105) thereto, and the court concluding that plaintiffs' amended complaint remains clearly deficient in its failure to apprise the reader of necessary factual details (i.e. . . . "who is alleged to have done what to whom and when." October 27, 2010 Memorandum at p. 5), and the court finding no portion of Judge Prince's order to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law," See L.R. 72.2, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' objections are DENIED. It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file their second amended complaint on or before December 28, 2010, and responses thereto shall be filed in accordance with the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in Judge Prince's October 27, 2010, Memorandum and Order.

S/ Christopher C. Conner

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20101206

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.