November 23, 2010
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
LIBERTY BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Senior Judge Flaherty
Submitted: October 12, 2010
BEFORE: HONORABLE BERNARD L. McGINLEY, Judge, HONORABLE ROCHELLE S. FRIEDMAN, Senior Judge, HONORABLE JIM FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
Liberty Bail Bonds (Liberty) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County (trial court) which denied, without prejudice, Liberty's application to act as a surety in Montgomery County, as Liberty's Montgomery County Surety agent, Robert Allan Stockett (Stockett), fails to comply with Montgomery County Local Rule of Criminal Procedure (Local Rule) 531(A)(10)(a), as he does not maintain an office in Montgomery County. We reverse and remand.
On May 26, 2009, Liberty filed an application to act as a surety in Montgomery County, seeking to enroll Stockett as a surety agent in Montgomery County. Montgomery County did not file a formal response, but refused to grant approval to act as a surety in Montgomery County due to Liberty's failure to establish an office in Montgomery County pursuant to Local Rule 531(A)(10)(a).
Liberty sought to have the trial court compel the clerk of courts to issue said license. On November 24, 2009, a hearing was held before the trial court. Liberty contended that there is a distinction between a bondsman and a surety company/agent and that as a surety agent Stockett was exempt from Local Rule 531(A)(10)(a). A surety agent (a licensed casualty agent) must be licensed by the Pennsylvania Department of Insurance (Department), pass annual tests, and must act under power of attorney with a qualified insurance carrier. The licensure that a surety receives is a statewide license, same as any other insurance agent. Surety agents are explicitly excluded from the statutory definition of bondsmen. 42 Pa. C.S. §5741. Moreover, bondsmen do not have to be licensed by the Department and are subject to local rules and applicable statutes. Surety agents, however, are regulated, tested, and policed by a state agency. Thus, Stockett, a licensed surety agent, was exempt from Local Rule 531(A)(10)(a), because he is a registered surety agent, not a professional bondsman as defined by 42 Pa. C.S. §5741. Stockett admitted he did not have an office in Montgomery County.
On November 30, 2009, the trial court issued an order denying the application, without prejudice, for failure to comply with Local Rule 531(A)(10)(a). Liberty filed a timely notice of appeal to the Superior Court. On January 7, 2010, the trial court issued an order directing Liberty to file a concise statement of matters complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(b). At the time, due to clerical error, no statement was filed. On February 23, 2010, the trial court filed it opinion in the matter, rejecting Liberty's appeal, due to Liberty's failure to file a timely 1925(b) statement.
On March 24, 2010, Liberty filed a request to allow the filing of a concise statement of matters complained of on appeal nunc pro tunc pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(c). On March 4, 2010, the trial court rejected Liberty's 1925(c) claim, without prejudice, and affirmed the dismissal of Liberty's appeal.
On March 17, 2010, the Superior Court, upon consent and advisement of Liberty, transferred jurisdiction over this matter to this court. On May 13, 2010, this court quashed Liberty's appeal for lack of a timely filed 1925(b) statement. On May 20, 2010, Liberty filed a motion for reconsideration of this court's order quashing Liberty's appeal. On June 15, 2010, this court entered an order remanding the matter to the trial court and allowing Liberty to file a 1925(b) statement nunc pro tunc.
On June 21, 2010, Liberty filed said 1925(b) statement. On June 23, 2010, the trial court issued an opinion that rejected Liberty's claim. Liberty now appeals to this court.*fn1
Initially, Liberty contends that the trial court erred in denying Liberty's application to have Stockett act as a surety in Montgomery County where Stockett is a licensed surety, not a bondsman and therefore, exempt from the local rules requiring an office within the county.
The Legislature has defined a "Professional bondsman" in 42 Pa. C.S. §5741 as:
Any person, other than a fidelity or surety company or any of its officers, agents, attorneys, or employees, authorized to execute bail bonds or to solicit business on its behalf, who:
(1) engages in the business of giving bail, giving or soliciting undertakings, or giving or soliciting indemnity or counter-indemnity to sureties on undertakings; or
(2) within a period of 30 days has become a surety, or has indemnified a surety, for the release on bail of a person, with or without a fee or compensation, or promise thereof, in three or more matters not arising out of the same transaction. (Emphasis added.)
Additionally, 42 Pa. C.S. §5744 provides that, "[n]o license shall be issued to, and no privileges or rights conferred by any license issued under the provisions of this subchapter shall be exercised by, any professional bondsman, unless such professional bondsman has and shall thereafter maintain an office in the county in which he conducts or intends to conduct his business." Local Rule 531(A)(10)(a) states, in pertinent part as follows:
Every professional bail bondsman must present proof that he or she maintains an office in Montgomery County from which his or her business is conducted pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S. §5744, and he or she must post and maintain as security with the Clerk the sum of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars in United States currency or securities of the United States Government.
It is undisputed that Stockett did not have a local office in Montgomery County. However, it is also undisputed that Stockett is a surety agent, not a bondsman, and therefore exempt from the above provision. The exemption resides in the initial clauses of the statute at issue here, 42 Pa. C.S. §5741, the statutory definition of a professional bondsman.
The Legislature defined a professional bondsman and the class of persons that must maintain a local office. The Legislature explicitly excluded surety companies and their agents from the definition of professional bondsmen and thus, the local office requirements.
The conditions that a surety company/agent must comply with prior to engaging in a surety business in Pennsylvania are set forth in 40 P.S. §832, Act of May 17, 1921, P.L. 682, as amended.*fn2 A surety must be licensed by the Department, carry a statewide license, must pass certain testing, must be backed by an insurance company and must abide by the specific financing and solvency conditions set forth in 40 P.S. §832. A professional bail bondsmen is not subject to these conditions. Moreover, a professional bail bondsmen is solely in the business of posting bail for incarcerated individuals.
Rule 531 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure lists the qualifications of a surety in pertinent part as follows:
(A) Subject to any additional requirements prescribed by local rule of court, the following shall be qualified to act as sureties:
(3) surety companies approved by the court and authorized to do business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
(4) professional bondsmen licensed under the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. §§5741-5749..
Pa. R.Crim.P. No. 531. The separate listing of sureties and professional bondsmen further demonstrates the Legislature's clear intention and continual practice of distinguishing the two entities.
Further, the Local Rule's themselves do not support the trial court's interpretation. Local Rule 531(A)(6-11) sets forth the requirements to be a surety and/or act as a surety in the county. Subsection (8) delineates the qualifications necessary for a corporate surety to act in Montgomery County, subsection (9) similarly provides the qualifications and rules pertaining to an individual surety agent, and subsection (10) sets forth the qualifications necessary to be a professional bail bondsmen.*fn3 The Local Rules provide different sections and rules for sureties and professional bail bondsmen. Neither the corporate surety, nor the surety agent is required to have a local office operating within Montgomery County. Only the professional bail bondsman is required to have such office.
Finally, a letter sent on April 23, 2009, by the Department's Bureau of Licensing and Enforcement, Licensing Supervisor Zena Fortson, sets forth that ".insurance producers for surety (companies) are not required to have an office located in each county. The insurance producer license is a statewide license." R.R. 1a, Exhibit G. Stockett is a surety agent who is licensed by the Department to make, execute, seal and deliver surety bail bonds for Liberty. Stockett is underwritten by Seneca Insurance Company, a licensed New York Insurance carrier. Stockett is further authorized, by power of attorney, to write sureties for Seneca. Stockett operates as a surety agent, not a professional bondsman.
Accordingly, we must reverse the trial court's order and remand to the trial court to direct the Clerk of Courts of Montgomery County to issue a license to Liberty to act as a surety and permit Stockett to act as a surety agent in Montgomery County. Jurisdiction relinquished.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of November, 2010 the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County in the above-captioned matter is reversed. Further, we remand to the trial court to direct the Clerk of Courts of Montgomery County to issue a license to Liberty to act as a surety and permit Stockett to engage in business as a surety agent in Montgomery County. Jurisdiction relinquished.
JIM FLAHERTY, Senior Judge