IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
October 20, 2010
JUAN ALBERTO-SILVA MARTINEZ, PLAINTIFF,
S.C.I. RETREAT; JOHNNY DAIZ AND FAMILY; JAMES MCGRADY; RAUL SILVA; BARRY MOJIOA; JEMY CRUIZ; JOHN NEGIOA; BRENDA HARDY DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge
District Judge Joy Flowers Conti
The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) on July 15, 2010, and was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on September 23, 2010 (ECF No. 6) recommending that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff was served with the report and recommendation at the address he provided to the Court and was advised that he had until October 12, 2010 to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.
After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2010;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. §1983.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.