Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilson v. Roth

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 17, 2010

JAMES FISCHER WILSON, PETITIONER,
v.
DEON ROTH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this ____ of September, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge (Doc. 24), and no objections having been filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.

20100917

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.