Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tarquini v. Gorberg

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 9, 2010

DANA L. TARQUINI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAVID J. GORBERG, ESQUIRE, AND DAVID J. GORBERG, P.C., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cynthia M. Rufe, J.

ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 16], Plaintiff's Response and Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 17], Defendants' Reply [Doc. No. 20] and Plaintiff's Sur-reply [Doc. No. 21], and for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) Defendants' Motion is DENIED; and

2) Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. If found to be otherwise meritorious, Plaintiff will not have to prove special damages to succeed in her claim.

It is so ORDERED.

20100909

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.