IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
September 9, 2010
DANA L. TARQUINI, PLAINTIFF,
DAVID J. GORBERG, ESQUIRE, AND DAVID J. GORBERG, P.C., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cynthia M. Rufe, J.
ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 16], Plaintiff's Response and Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 17], Defendants' Reply [Doc. No. 20] and Plaintiff's Sur-reply [Doc. No. 21], and for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1) Defendants' Motion is DENIED; and
2) Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. If found to be otherwise meritorious, Plaintiff will not have to prove special damages to succeed in her claim.
It is so ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.