Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Babin v. Stantec

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 25, 2010

CHRIS A. BABIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STANTEC, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND STANTEC CONSULTING, LTD., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion (1) For Conditional Certification of Collective Class; (2) For Authorization to Serve Court-Supervised Notice of Suit Upon All Potential Collective Class Members; and (3) To Compel Defendants to Provide the Names, Last Known Addresses and Phone Numbers of All Potential Class Members (Document No. 39, filed April 21, 2010); Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion (Document No. 40, filed April 21, 2010); Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Conditional Certification of a Collective Action (Document Nos. 43-48, filed May 5, 2010); Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Supplemental Motion for Conditional Certification (Document No. 50, filed May 17, 2010); Defendants' Sur-Reply Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Conditional Certification of a Collective Action (Document No. 21, filed June 9, 2010); Defendants' Notice of Motion to Strike and Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Declarations Submitted in Support of His Supplemental Motion for Conditional Certification (Document No. 42, filed May 5, 2010); and Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike Expert Declarations (Document No. 49, filed May 17, 2009), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated August 25, 2010, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Conditional Certification is DENIED and Defendants' Motion to Strike Expert Declarations is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will conduct a Scheduling Conference in due course.

20100825

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.