IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 10, 2010
GEORGE CATER AND CHERYL CATER, PLAINTIFFS,
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Louis H. Pollak, J.
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2010, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Starbucks' motion for summary judgment against Mastropieri and George and Cheryl Cater, based upon a lack of duty and right to indemnification (docket no. 90) is DENIED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.