Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 5, 2010

TAMMY WHITE
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mary A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 10); the defendant's opposition, the plaintiff's reply, and the defendant's sur-reply thereto; the plaintiff's supplemental authority to its motion and the defendant's response thereto; and the defendant's supplemental authority in opposition to the plaintiff's motion; and for the reasons set forth in a Memorandum of today's date; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a response to the defendant's Motion for Change of Venue (Docket No. 4) on or before August 19, 2010. The defendant shall then have one week to file a brief in reply.

20100805

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.