IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 3, 2010
NATHAN GEESEY, PLAINTIFF,
STRYKER CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joel H. Slomsky, J.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 17), Defendants' Reply in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 18), argument made at the hearing held on May 26, 2010, and after a complete and independent review of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 2) and Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 25), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's August 3, 2010 Opinion, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's strict liability claim is GRANTED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's fraud and fraudulent concealment claims is DENIED.
3. The Court will schedule a pre-trial conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 with Plaintiff and Defendants as to the remaining counts.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.