Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rodriguez v. Bledsoe

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 2, 2010

RICHARD RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER
v.
B.A. BLEDSOE, RESPONDENT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 17) for reconsideration, filed by petitioner Richard Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), wherein Rodriguez avers that he was not served with a copy of the May 7, 2010 report (Doc. 8) of the magistrate judge, which recommended that Rodriguez's petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied because Rodriguez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and it appearing that by order (Doc. 15) dated June 15, 2010, the court adopted the magistrate judge's report and closed the above-captioned matter, and that Rodriguez's instant motion (Doc. 17) offers no cognizable justification for his failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence...."); see also Max's Seafood Café by Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 677 (3d Cir. 1999), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 17) for reconsideration is DENIED.*fn1

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.