IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 20, 2010
MICHAEL MCKENNA, WILLIAM MCKENNA, AND RAYMOND CARNATION
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mary A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and a New Trial on Equitable Relief and Judgment of Entried Jury Verdict Award under the PHRA [sic] (Docket No. 264 in Case No. 98-5835; Docket No. 284 in Case No. 99-1163) and the defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, and for a New Trial, or in the Alternative, for Remittitur of the Verdict (Docket No. 263 in Case No. 98-5835 and Docket No. 283 in Case No. 99-1163), and the responses and replies thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in a Memorandum of today's date, that the Motions are DENIED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.