IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 8, 2010
ROBERT BECKER PLAINTIFF,
CITY UNIVERSITY OF SEATTLE, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.
AND NOW, this 8TH day of July 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") (Doc. #22) and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. #25), it is ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have leave to amend his SAC, but if he fails to amend it by July 30, 2010, then his SAC will be dismissed with prejudice.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.