IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
June 16, 2010
EDWARD GEE PETITIONER,
JOHN KERESTES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.
ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Chief Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. #9), Petitioner Edward Gee's Objections to the R&R (Doc. #10), as well as Defendants' Response (Doc. #12), it is ORDERED that:
* The R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED, with the exception that Petitioner's prosecutorial misconduct claim is not procedurally defaulted, but rather denied on the merits.
* Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and
* There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. s/Anita B. Brody
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.