Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gee v. Kerestes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


June 16, 2010

EDWARD GEE PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN KERESTES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.

ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Chief Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. #9), Petitioner Edward Gee's Objections to the R&R (Doc. #10), as well as Defendants' Response (Doc. #12), it is ORDERED that:

* The R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED, with the exception that Petitioner's prosecutorial misconduct claim is not procedurally defaulted, but rather denied on the merits.

* Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and

* There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. s/Anita B. Brody

20100616

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.