Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Varano

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


June 9, 2010

MICHAEL JOHNSON, PETITIONER
v.
DAVID A. VARANO, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 12) for reconsideration of the order of court (Doc. 11) dated February 4, 2010, wherein the court adopted the report (Doc. 9) of the magistrate judge, which recommended that the petition for habeas corpus filed by petitioner Michael Johnson ("Johnson") be denied, and it appearing that Johnson claims he was not served with the magistrate judge's report, (see Doc. 12 ¶ 6), and that this prevented him from filing timely objections thereto, and it further appearing that Johnson's motion fails to identify any substantive-law rationale for disturbing the court's prior order, and concluding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order,*fn1 see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 12) for reconsideration is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.