IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
April 27, 2010
INSTRUMENTATION TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Fullam, Sr. J.
This case arises from the loss of the space shuttle Columbia, which broke up upon re-entry over Texas in 2003. The plaintiff alleges that it had placed scientific experiments aboard the shuttle that survived the disaster and were recovered by NASA in a Texas parking lot. The plaintiff alleges that NASA denied it access to the experiments and failed to maintain them in the proper conditions, ruining them.
The plaintiff has requested leave to file a second amended complaint to "clarify" that it challenges both the government's actions in handling the experiments and the decisions at the time of launch that allegedly led to the catastrophe. The government opposes the amendment, arguing that it will be prejudiced because it has already devoted substantial time to searching for documents relating to the more narrow focus of the case and that the plaintiff waited too long to amend.
Mindful that "[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires," I will grant the plaintiff's motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The defendant contends that several more months will be needed for discovery on the complaint as amended; as the relevant federal statutes allowed this case to be filed six years after the ill-fated shuttle mission, I do not find the additional delay to be undue nor the need for additional discovery overly prejudicial.
An order will be entered.
John P. Fullam, Sr. J.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.