Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dickey v. Acquisitions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 14, 2010

ROBERT DICKEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TYLER AND MORGAN ACQUISITIONS DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge Carlson

Judge Conner

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, which had been assigned to the undersigned for pretrial management, and to the district court for trial. The plaintiff has now filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Doc. 3.) It is therefore recommended that the case be dismissed and closed. Furthermore, since the plaintiff has filed a voluntary dismissal, and no other party has entered an appearance in this matter, it is recommended that the Court forego Local Rule 72.3's notice and objection period requirements which otherwise attach to a Report and Recommendation by a United States Magistrate Judge.

Submitted this 14th day of April, 2010.

Martin C. Carlson United States Magistrate Judge

20100414

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.