IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
April 8, 2010
MARTIN LUTHER PEYNADO, PLAINTIFF
MARY SABOL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel (Doc. 25), and it appearing that, at this juncture of the litigation, plaintiff is capable of proceeding on his own and that review of the claims reveals that they implicate neither complex legal or factual issues nor require factual investigation or the testimony of expert witnesses, see Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993) (listing factors relevant to request for counsel), it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 25) is DENIED. If further proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter will be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of plaintiff. See id.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.