UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
April 1, 2010
WILLIAM AND STACY SHIPP, PLAINTIFFS,
DONNA DONAHER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Louis H. Pollak, J.
This court has discovered a typographical error on page 31 of the opinion issued in this case on March 25, 2010 (docket no. 26). In discussing which counts would be dismissed with and without prejudice, the opinion states as follows:
Count 13 will be dismissed with prejudice because plaintiffs would be unable to state an antitrust injury in an amended complaint, and Count 15 must be dismissed with prejudice as pled against PNC [Bank, N.A.] and [James] Rohr, given that those defendants may not be considered debt collectors with regard to the SBA loan. By contrast, Counts 14 and 23, and Count 15 insofar as it applies to Tucker [Arensberg, P.C.] and [Donna] Donaher, are being dismissed for pleading deficiencies that may potentially be remedied by amendment of the complaint; those counts will accordingly be dismissed without prejudice.
To be consistent both with the analysis at pages 29-30 of the opinion, as well as with the order accompanying the opinion, the second of these sentences should refer to "the remaining defendants" instead of to Tucker and Donaher. The sentence will therefore be amended pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which permits this court to "correct a clerical mistake . . . whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record."*fn1
AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that, on page 31, lines 10-11 of the opinion entered by this court in this matter on March 25, 2010 (docket no. 26), the words "Tucker and Donaher" are stricken and replaced with the words "the remaining defendants."