IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 24, 2010
MARK MITCHELL, PETITIONER
JEFFREY BEARD, SECRETARY; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge
NOW, this 24th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the following documents:
(1) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed October 12, 2006*fn1 ;
(2) Memorandum of Law in Support of § 2254 Habeas Corpus Petition, which brief was filed November 7, 2006;
(3) Respondents' Answer to Petition for Habeas Relief, which response was filed February 21, 2007;
(4) Respondents' Supplemental Answer to Petition for Habeas Relief, which response was filed September 17, 2007;
(5) Petitioner's Response to the Respondents' Supplemental Answer, which reply was filed October 5, 2007;
(6) Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin filed June 30, 2008 ("R&R");
(7) Respondents' Objection to Recommendation That Certificate of Appealability Be Granted, which objection was filed July 9, 2008 ("Respondents' Objection");
(8) Petitioner's Written Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate, which objections were filed July 17, 2008 ("Petitioner's Objections"); and
(9) Respondents' Brief Answer to Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation, which response was filed November 20, 2009,
IT IS ORDERED that the R&R is approved and adopted in part and rejected in part.*fn2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Objections to the R&R are overruled.*fn3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the within habeas petition is denied as untimely filed without a hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents' Objection to the R&R is sustained.*fn4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this action is time- barred, and no reasonable jurist could find this procedural ruling debatable, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this matter for statistical purposes.