Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Cunningham

March 23, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAVID CUNNINGHAM, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

Order of Court

AND NOW, this 23rd March, 2010, upon consideration of the foregoing Motion in Limine Concerning Pornographic Images and File Names (doc. no. 99), and government's response thereto (doc. no. 101), it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is DENIED. The parties may (but are not required to) use representative samples of the Child Pornography instead of the entire "collections," as well as the file names of the various files in the "collection". (See doc. no. 101). Additionally, the parties may (but are not required to) stipulate that the child pornography evidence constitutes child pornography for purposes of the Indictment.

Finally, the parties shall meet in an attempt to stipulate to a Joint Cautionary Jury Instruction similar to that set forth in the government's response (see doc. no. 101 at 7-8). Said instruction shall be jointly filed by March 25, 2010, or if no agreement is reached, separate instructions may be filed by March 25, 2010.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of March, 2010.

20100323

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.