IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 23, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
DAVID CUNNINGHAM, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge
Order of Court
AND NOW, this 23rd March, 2010, upon consideration of the foregoing Motion in Limine Concerning Pornographic Images and File Names (doc. no. 99), and government's response thereto (doc. no. 101), it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is DENIED. The parties may (but are not required to) use representative samples of the Child Pornography instead of the entire "collections," as well as the file names of the various files in the "collection". (See doc. no. 101). Additionally, the parties may (but are not required to) stipulate that the child pornography evidence constitutes child pornography for purposes of the Indictment.
Finally, the parties shall meet in an attempt to stipulate to a Joint Cautionary Jury Instruction similar to that set forth in the government's response (see doc. no. 101 at 7-8). Said instruction shall be jointly filed by March 25, 2010, or if no agreement is reached, separate instructions may be filed by March 25, 2010.
SO ORDERED this 23rd day of March, 2010.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.