Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Frederick Banks v. Niclkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 11, 2010

FREDERICK BANKS, PLAINTIFF
v.
JULIE NICLKIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's second renewed motion to prepare and serve subpoenas (Doc. 113), and it appearing that defendants seek to have the motion denied as premature because they anticipate filing a dispositive motion (Doc. 115) prior to proceeding to trial, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 113) is DENIED as premature.

2. Any and all dispositive motions shall be filed on or before March 26, 2010.

3. No extensions of the dispostive motions deadline shall be granted absent good cause. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b).

4. Plaintiff may re-file his motion to prepare and serve subpoenas after dispositive motions, if any, have been ruled upon by the court.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20100311

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.