Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 9, 2010

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAINTIFF
v.
BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., DEFENDANT
BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., CONSOLIDATED PLAINTIFF
v.
ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., CONSOLIDATED DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

(CONSOLIDATED)

(Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 644) for contempt and sanctions, filed by Arlington Industries, Incorporated ("Arlington"), wherein Arlington requests that the court hold Bridgeport Fittings, Incorporated ("Bridgeport") in contempt for failure to comply with the confession of judgment and injunction (Doc. 270) entered on June 30, 2006, and upon further consideration of the memorandum and order of court (Doc. 776) issued on the date hereof, wherein the court stayed enforcement of the June 30, 2006 injunction pending appellate review of the above-captioned matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 644) for contempt and sanctions is DENIED.*fn1 See Maness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449, 458 (1975) (explaining that orders and judgments of the court must be complied with unless a party obtains a stay pending appeal); see also Harris v. City of Phila., 47 F.3d 1333, 1337 (3d Cir. 1995) (same).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.