Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Esteves v. SEPTA
February 16, 2010
BRADFORD ESTEVES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SEPTA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Curtis Joyner, J.
ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10) and responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 11, 12), it is hereby ordered that the Motion is GRANTED for reasons set out in the attached Memorandum.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint to include Cynthia Thompson as a defendant is DENIED for the reasons set out in the attached Memorandum.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...