Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Byrne v. Cleveland Clinic

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 8, 2010

WILLIAM F. BYRNE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gene E.K. Pratter United States District Judge

AMENDED ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of February 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 13 and 14), and for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued on February 5, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. To the extent that Mr. Byrne brings a stabilization claim under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act ("EMTALA"), the motions to dismiss are GRANTED and the stabilization claim is DISMISSED with prejudice;

2. The motions to dismiss are DENIED as to Mr. Byrne's screening claim under EMTALA; and

3. Mr. Byrne's breach of implied contract claim is dismissed with prejudice.

20100208

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.