IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 29, 2010
ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V., PLAINTIFF,
THE PUROLITE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joel H. Slomsky, J
AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence of Prior Negotiations Leading Up to the 2004 Contract (Doc. No. 61), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 69), Plaintiff's Reply on Parol Evidence Issues (Doc. No. 73), Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Support of the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 80), and Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 81), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion dated January 29, 2010, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 61) is DENIED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.