IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 29, 2010
ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V., PLAINTIFF,
THE PUROLITE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joel H. Slomsky, J
AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence That Plaintiff Was Obligated to Supply Defendant With Styrene Through March 2005 (Doc. No. 64), Defendant's Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 67), Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 78), and Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 80), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion dated January 29, 2010, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.