Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ECEM European Chemical Marketing B.V. v. Purolite Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 29, 2010

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL MARKETING B.V., PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE PUROLITE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joel H. Slomsky, J

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence That Plaintiff Was Obligated to Supply Defendant With Styrene Through March 2005 (Doc. No. 64), Defendant's Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 67), Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 78), and Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 80), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion dated January 29, 2010, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

20100129

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.