Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

O'Brien v. Campbell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 25, 2010

JOHN JACOB O'BRIEN, JR., PLAINTIFF
v.
WARDEN CAMPBELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

(Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of the document (Doc. 11), filed by plaintiff, requesting a conference under Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and it appearing that the above-captioned matter is a proceeding exempt from initial disclosure, see FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv) (providing that "an action brought without an attorney by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision" is a proceeding exempt from initial disclosure), and the court finding no reason to compel a Rule 26(f) conference, see FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f)(1) ("Except in a proceeding exempted from initial disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1)(B) or when the court orders otherwise, the parties must confer . . . .") (emphasis added), it is hereby ORDERED that the document (Doc. 11) is CONSTRUED as a motion to compel defendants to confer with plaintiff, and is DENIED as so construed.

20100125

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.