IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 22, 2010
AIRGAS-EAST, INC., PLAINTIFF,
GT & S, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant, LVH's, Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 49), Plaintiff's response in opposition (doc. no. 51), Defendant's reply (doc. no. 66), Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. no. 50), Defendant's response in opposition (doc. no. 56), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 50) is GRANTED and Defendant's motion (doc. no. 49) is DENIED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.