Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Friedman v. Yula
January 15, 2010
ALLAN FRIEDMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ANTHONY YULA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Eduardo C. Robreno, J.
AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, as follows:
1. Defendants' motions to dismiss and compel arbitration (doc. nos. 22, 25) are GRANTED;
2. Defendants' motions to stay and dismiss for lack of standing (doc. nos. 22, 25) are DENIED.
3. All claims having been dismissed, this case shall be marked CLOSED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...