IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
December 17, 2009
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Elizabeth T. Hey United States Magistrate Judge
AND NOW, this 17th day of December 2009, after consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 50(b) (Doc. 53), Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(c) (Doc. 54), and Defendant's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and to Tax Costs Against Plaintiff (Doc. 55), as well as the responses and replies to the responses filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's motions are DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED with respect to his request to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), but GRANTED with respect to taxing costs against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 54.
3. The Clerk of Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to award costs to Defendant. However, Defendant has until December 22, 2009, to correct his Bill of Costs if it contains an incorrect witness fee, and the Clerk shall not enter the cost award until after December 22, 2009.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.