Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Yarbrough v. Klopotoski

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 8, 2009

VICTOR YARBROUGH PETITIONER,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT MR. MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYNN ABRAHAM; AND, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Document No. 1, filed January 23, 2009), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated October 30, 2009 (Document No. 13), and Petitioner's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 14, filed November 20, 2009),*fn1

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated October 30, 2009, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner's Objection to Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED AND DENIED; and,

4. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right or this Court's procedural rulings with respect to petitioner's claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.