Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Forbes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


November 25, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
MICHAEL D. FORBES

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of defendant's pro se motion (Doc. 1274) for reconsideration of the memorandum and order of court (Doc. 1271) dated October 19, 2009, wherein the court denied defendant's motion (Doc. 1238) to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence...."), it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 1274) for reconsideration is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20091125

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.