Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Snead v. Diguglielmo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


November 19, 2009

ROBERT SNEAD
v.
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO; SUPERINTENDENT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; AND, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THESTATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2009, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Robert Snead (Document No. 1, filed April 16, 2009), the record in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell dated October 21, 2009, no objections having been filed, and the time for filing objections having expired, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell dated October 21, 2009 is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Robert Snead, is DISMISSED as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); and,

3. A certificate of appealability WILL NOT ISSUE because reasonable jurists would not debate this Court's rulings. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

20091119

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.