IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 13, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J
AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Relief From Judgment Pursuant to 18  U.S.C. § 2255 and Supporting Legal Memorandum (Document No. 49, filed July 24, 2009), the Government's Response to Defendant's Pro-Se Petition for Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Document No. 53, filed August 27, 2009), petitioner's Reply to Government's Response to § 2255 Motion (Document No. 56, filed October 7, 2009), and the Government's Sur-Response to Defendant's Reply Brief Under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 (Document No. 59, filed November 12, 2009), for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that the the Petition for Relief From Judgment Pursuant to 18  U.S.C. § 2255 filed by Ronald Harmon is DENIED.
A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right or this Court's procedural rulings with respect to petitioner's claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.