Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gregory v. Enhanced Recovery Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


November 2, 2009

SUZANNE GREGORY, PLAINTIFF
v.
ENHANCED RECOVERY CORP., DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2009, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 6) for reconsideration of the order of court (Doc. 5) dated October 23, 2009, wherein the court denied plaintiff's motion (Doc. 4) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, and that plaintiff presents no new evidence for the court's review, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 6) for reconsideration is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20091102

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.