Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Doe v. Schneider

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 29, 2009

JOHN DOE, ET AL
v.
KENNETH SCHNEIDER, ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2009, upon consideration of Defendants Kenneth Schneider, Bernard Schneider, Marjorie Schneider, Susan Schneider and The Apogee Foundation's Motion to Dismiss, the response filed in opposition and the reply thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. #5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

* Defendants' Motion as to Count I is denied;

* Defendants' Motion as to Count II is denied;

* Defendants' Motion as to Count III is granted in part. Plaintiff John Doe's claim for vicarious liability is dismissed;

* Defendants' Motion as to Count IV is denied;

* Defendants' Motion as to Count V is granted.

* Defendants' Motion as to Count VI is granted in part. Plaintiff Jane Doe's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is dismissed;

* Defendants' Motion as to Count VII is granted; and

* Defendants' Motion as to Count VIII is granted.

Further, Defendants' "Motion to Grant as Uncontested their Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint" (Doc. #7) is DENIED.

20091029

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.