IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
September 15, 2009
JOSEPH O. BOGGI, PLAINTIFF,
MEDICAL REVIEW AND ACCREDITING COUNCIL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Berle M. Schiller, J.
AND NOW, this 15thday of September, 2009, upon consideration of the First Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by MRAC and Larry Downs, the Motion to Dismiss filed by NBME/IPE, Andrea Ciccone, Scott Manaker, Richard Hawkins and Donald Melnick, the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Joseph Sokolowski, Plaintiff's responses thereto, Defendant's replies thereon, and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum dated September 15, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to add the National Board of Medical Examiners as a defendant (Document No. 43) is GRANTED.
2 The MRAC/Downs' motion to dismiss (Document No. 26) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint against these Defendants is DISMISSED.
3. The NBME/IPE Defendants' motion to dismiss (Document No. 29) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint against these Defendants is DISMISSED.
4. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Document No. 31) is GRANTED.
5. Defendant's Sokolowski's motion to dismiss (Document No. 37) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint against this Defendant is DISMISSED.
6. Plaintiff's motion for a court appointed expert (Document No. 44) is DENIED.
7. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint (Document No. 45) is GRANTED to the extent that the Court considered all of Dr. Boggi's filed Complaints in reaching its decision.
8. Defendants IPE, Ciccone, Manaker, Hawkins, Melnick's Praecipe to File a Reply Memorandum (Document No. 50) is GRANTED.
9. Defendants MRAC, Downs, and Sokolowski's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief (Document No. 53) is GRANTED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.