Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kosmoski v. Express Times Newspaper

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 19, 2009

NIKKI KOSMOSKI PLAINTIFF
v.
EXPRESS TIMES NEWSPAPER DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas M. Golden, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15), Defendant's Errata to its Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18), Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit (Doc. No. 22), Plaintiff's Sur-reply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), and Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence (Doc. No. 14), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Affidavit in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18), which will be construed as a motion to extend discovery, is GRANTED. An Amended Scheduling Order will be docketed;

2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW by the date set forth in the Court's forthcoming Amended Scheduling Order; and

3. Defendant's Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW by the date set forth in the Court's forthcoming Amended Scheduling Order.

20090819

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.