IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 30, 2009
STEPHEN P. JURINKO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE CO., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cynthia M. Rufe, J.
AND NOW, this 30th day of July 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Supplemental Attorneys Fees and Statutory Interest [Doc. No. 110], Defendant's Response in opposition [Doc. Nos. 112 & 113], Plaintiffs' Reply [Doc. No. 114], and Defendant's Sur-reply [Doc. No. 120], it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion [Doc. No. 110] is DENIED.
Also, upon consideration of Defendant's Amended Motion for Partial Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) [Doc. No. 121], Plaintiffs' Response in opposition [Doc. No. 123], and Defendant's Reply [Doc. No. 124], it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.