Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Pearson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


July 28, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANDREW PEARSON ALSO KNOWN AS COOKIE ALSO KNOWN AS GARNETT LEWIS OWENS ALSO KNOWN AS LOUIS OWENS, CORNELIUS NEWBERN ALSO KNOWN AS CORN, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED ORDER OF COURT RELATING TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOC. NOS. 105, 106, 107 AND 108)

After consideration of defendants' Motions in Limine (doc. nos. 105, 106, 107 and 108), and opposition thereto (doc. nos. 111,114, 112, and 113) , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Newbern's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Government from Offering Any Additional Witness Identification Evidence at Trial (doc. no. 105) is DENIED AS MOOT, given the Government's response that it does not intend to offer any additional witness identification evidence.

2. Defendant Pearson's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Other Crimes, Wrongs or Bad Acts That Have Been Identified by the Government (doc. no. 106) is DENIED as to the evidence that Mr. Pearson's alleged relationship with Ms. Scalzitti and that he allegedly verbally and physically assaulted Ms. Scalzitti as said evidence is inextricably intertwined with the charges in the indictment and it is proper Rule 404(b) evidence in that it has a proper purpose, it is relevant, and its probative value outweighs its potential for unfair prejudice. The parties shall submit a joint proposed limiting instruction for the jury on or before August 4, 2009. The Motion is GRANTED as to the evidence that Pearson has faked or exaggerated an injury, unless Pearson opens the door during trial proceedings.

3. Defendant Pearson's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Out of Court Identifications That Have Not Been Disclosed (doc. no. 107) (like doc. no. 105) is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. Defendant Pearson's Motion in Limine to Prohibit the Prosecution and Its Witnesses from Using Nicknames in Court When Referring to Defendants (Doc. No. 108) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Government shall address defendants by their proper names throughout the trial except where the use of defendants' nicknames is appropriate or necessary as part of the questioning of a witness.

SO ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2009.

20090728

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.