IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 27, 2009
STANLEY A. PUGH, PLAINTIFF,
CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Eduardo C. Robreno, J.
AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2009, following a hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (doc. nos. 18 and 22), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant Chester Downs' and Defendant Dougherty's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 22) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. It is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims [Counts I - IV] against Defendant Dougherty. It is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's state malicious prosecution claim [Count VI] against Defendant Dougherty.
2. Defendant Onick's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 18) is GRANTED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.