IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 23, 2009
BRAD MCKOUEN AND DELTA STAFFING LLC, PLAINTIFFS,
UNITED STATES DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terrence F. McVerry United States District Court Judge
Pending before the Court is THE UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS (Document No. 3), which was filed on June 2, 2009. On June 3, 2009, the Court entered a Text Order which directed the pro se Plaintiffs to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss on or before June 22, 2009. This Text Order was sent to the Plaintiffs via Certified Mail and a certified return receipt card was signed on June 6, 2009 and returned. However, the deadline passed several weeks ago and, as of the date of this Memorandum Order, Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs Brad McKouen and Delta Staffing, LLC, filed a pro se Petition to Quash Summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). The United States contends that the Petition should be dismissed for several reasons: (1) Plaintiffs failed to properly serve the Petition on the United States; (2) Delta Staffing, as a corporate entity, may not be represented by a non-attorney; and (3) the Petition was not signed by any party.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) provides for dismissal based on insufficient service of process. The rules governing service are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Indeed, on September 29, 2008 (shortly after the Petition was filed), the Court entered a Text Order which specifically recited applicable sections of Rule 4 and directed Plaintiffs to properly serve the Petition on the United States and to file Proof of Service with the Court. Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing proper service. Grand Entertainment Group v. Star Media Sales, 988 F.2d 476, 488 (3d Cir. 1993).
Over the ensuing ten months, Plaintiffs have failed to effectuate proper service. Plaintiffs did send a FedEx Express package to the IRS offices in Saginaw, Michigan as reflected in the "Certificate of Service" filed on October 8, 2008. However, that effort clearly fails to satisfy the requirements of Rule 4(i), which requires service upon the United States attorney and the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C. Because Plaintiffs have previously been given specific notice of the need to effectuate proper service, and have failed to show good cause for their failure to do so, there is no reason for a further extension of time. Accordingly, the Petition will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5).*fn1
In accordance with the foregoing,THE UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS (Document No. 3)is GRANTED and the Petition to Quash IRS Summons is hereby DISMISSED. The clerk shall docket this case closed.
SO ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2009.