Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Angney v. Dimarco

July 23, 2009

BRIAN L. ANGNEY AND GINA GIAMPIETRO-ANGNEY , PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
ANTONIO C. DIMARCO AN INDIVIDUAL, A/K/A SAMUEL RICHARD SEKEL, II, ET AL., DEFENDANT(S).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED ORDER REQUIRING RICO STATEMENT

Count 10 of plaintiffs' Complaint sets forth a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. Complaint (doc. no. 1), ¶¶ 106-117. Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure LR 16.1.2D, the Court will require plaintiffs to file a RICO case statement.

Accordingly, on or before August 4, 2009, plaintiffs shall file a RICO case statement which shall set forth those facts upon which plaintiffs relied to initiate the RICO claim as a result of the "reasonable inquiry" required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The statement shall be in paragraph form corresponding by number and letter to the paragraphs and subparagraphs appearing below, and shall provide in detail and with specificity the information required by this Order.

1. State whether the alleged unlawful conduct is in violation of any or all of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(a), (b), (c) or (d).

2. List each defendant and state the alleged misconduct and basis of liability of each defendant.

3. List alleged wrongdoers, other than the defendants listed above, and state the alleged misconduct of each.

4. List the alleged victims and state how each victim has been allegedly injured.

5. Describe in detail the pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debts alleged for each RICO claim. The description of the pattern of racketeering shall include the following information:

a. A list of the alleged predicate acts and the specific statutes which were allegedly violated;

b. The date of each predicate act, the participants in each such predicate act and the relevant facts surrounding each such predicate act;

c. The time, place and contents of each alleged misrepresentation, the identity of persons by whom and to whom such alleged misrepresentation was made and if the predicate act was an offense of wire fraud, mail fraud or fraud in the sale of securities. The "circumstances constituting fraud or mistake" shall be stated with particularity as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b);

d. Whether there has been a criminal conviction for violation of any predicate act and, if so, a description of each such act;

e. Whether civil litigation has resulted in a judgment in regard to any predicate act and, if so, a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.