IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 22, 2009
KAREN L. LORD, PLAINTIFF
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2009, upon consideration of defendant's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 41) of the court's memorandum and order (Doc. 39) dated January 1, 2009, which granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion for summary judgment, and the court finding that the challenged order contains no manifest errors of law or fact,*fn1 see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 41) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge