Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation


June 26, 2009


The opinion of the court was delivered by: David R. Strawbridge United States Magistrate Judge


This Document Relates To: (Oil Rig Cases) (See Exhibit A - attached case list)


I. Introduction

Presently before the Court is the "Renewed Combined Motion and Brief to Compel Dr. Jay T. Segarra's Production of Documents and Response to Subpoena" (the "Renewed Motion") filed by Defendant Union Carbide Corporation ("Union Carbide") on June 4 and 5, 2009 (09-63215, Doc. 9),*fn1 in which Defendants ConocoPhillips Company and Oilfield Service and Supply Company have joined (collectively "Defendants") (09-63215, Doc. 12), and the response thereto (09-63215, Docs. 18-19) from the plaintiffs in the cases on the attached list (collectively "Plaintiffs"). The Renewed Motion incorporates the "Motion for Reconsideration of the Remedy Provided for in the Court's Order to Compel Dr. Segarra, Dr. Rao, and Dr. Bernstein" filed on March 12, 2009 (01-md-875, Doc. 5886) and "Certain Defendants Additional Briefing Regarding the Consulting Expert Privilege and the Exceptional Circumstances Presented by the Litigation Work" filed on March 20, 2009 (01- md-875, Doc. 5954), both filed by Forman Perry (counsel for Union Carbide), and following upon Judge Robreno's Order of February 24, 2009 directing Dr. Jay Segarra "to produce all documents and information relating to diagnosing reports or opinions for Plaintiffs with claims currently pending in MDL 875 within 20 days." (01-md-875, Doc. 5815). The Renewed Motion addresses Judge Robreno's Order only with respect to Dr. Segarra in these oil rig cases*fn2 where he has been identified as the diagnosing expert. Defendants seek the entry of an Order directing Dr. Segarra to produce the documents and information pertaining to his litigation screening practice without any limitation. For the reasons set out below, we GRANT in part and DENY in part Union Carbide's motion subject to the limitations set out in this memorandum and our accompanying Order, filed on June 25, 2009 (09-mc-103, Doc. 2).

II. Factual and Procedural Background

On December 19, 2005, Dr. Jay T. Segarra was served with a subpoena duces tecum (the "Subpoena") issued by the Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in connection with MDL-875. The Subpoena, which calls for the production of 27 categories of documents, was the subject of Judge Robreno's February 24, 2009 Order and Memorandum Opinion. In re: Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), 256 F.R.D. 151 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2009). By that Order, Dr. Segarra,and two other doctors not related to this motion, was ordered "to produce all documents and information relating to diagnosing reports or opinions for Plaintiffs with claims currently pending in MDL 875 within 20 days." Id. at 158. On May 29, 2009, noting that the plaintiffs on whose behalf a Daubert challenge had been advanced were no longer parties to the litigation, the Court denied Defendants' motion for reconsideration of that Order as moot. (Order Den. Def.'s Mot. for Recons., May 29, 2009, 01-md-875, Doc. 6275). Defendants were instructed to file plaintiff-specific motions to compel Dr. Segarra's compliance with the Subpoena if they chose to do so. Union Carbide then filed the Renewed Motion pertaining to these 200 (and more) cases where Dr. Segarra has been identified by Plaintiffs as the diagnosing physician. (09-63215, Doc. 9)

This motion has been referred to this United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Court's amended Order of Referral referring these cases to us "for final disposition of all pretrial matters not dispositive of a party's claim or defense pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed.R.Civ.P 72(a)." (See 09-63215, Doc. 6). As such, the motion was properly before us and we, in turn, ordered that any response to the motion be filed on or before June 17, 2009. (See 09-63215, Doc. 14). Plaintiffs filed a timely response on that date. (See 09-63215, Doc. 18). The motion is now ripe for our review.

III. Discussion

We consider the parties' papers within the confines of MDL-875 Judge Robreno's February 24, 2009 Memorandum and Order which granted in part and denied in part certain Defendants' motions to compel production of documents and certain Plaintiffs' motion to quash. In that memorandum, Judge Robreno directed that Dr. Segarra produce all "documents related to diagnoses of asbestos related conditions relied upon by Plaintiffs in MDL 875." In re: Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), 256 F.R.D. at 152 (emphasis added). Thus the question effectively before us at this time is the extent to which the documents in the possession or under the control of Dr. Segarra can be said to be "related to diagnoses of asbestos related conditions relied upon by Plaintiffs in MDL 875." We must determine whether this means that production is limited only to those documents and information specifically pertaining to individuals who are plaintiffs in the MDL litigation.

Plaintiffs assert that it is. Defendants assert that it is not so limited.

We do not read Judge Robreno's Order in the limiting manner suggested by Plaintiffs. We note that, among the definitions set out in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, for "relate" and "related," are "being connected; associated" and "to have connection, relation, or reference." See also Bobb v. United States AG, 458 F.3d 213, 219 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Webster's Third New International Dictionary (Unabridged) 1916 (1991)) ("The term 'relate' means 'to show or establish a logical or causal connection between.'"). This reading is consistent with the view taken by the Court in prior stages of this litigation in ordering production of all screening/litigation records of the challenged doctor. (See, e.g., Weiner, J. Order of March 19, 1999, 01-md-875, Doc. 2576; Giles, J. Order of February 12, 2007, 01-md-875, Doc. 4621; Giles, J. Order of October 25, 2007, 01-md-875, Doc. 4924; Giles, J. Administrative Order 12, May 31, 2007, 01-md-875, Doc. 4691; Giles, J. Order of April 24, 2008, 01-md-875, Doc. 5158). In holding that all of Dr. Segarra's screening and litigation documents must be produced, we merely conclude that these documents are "related to" MDL-875 claims. In re: Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), 256 F.R.D. at 152.

Additionally, Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b) itself provides for broad-based discovery "regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense.... Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." See also Lease v. Fishel, 07-CV-0003, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29305, *13 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2009). The rule likewise broadly provides that "[f]or good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action." Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b). We believe such good cause exists here.

Defendants have raised serious questions about Dr. Segarra's practices and methodology which, if proven, could have an impact upon his qualification as an expert in these cases. (See "Certain Defendants Additional Briefing Regarding the Consulting Expert Privilege and the Exceptional Circumstances Presented by the Litigation Work," 01-md-875, Doc. 5954). We agree that certain of these questions such as the number of patients screened and the rate of positive diagnoses found could well be factors to be considered in determining the methodology and screening practices which underlie the doctor's diagnoses. (See Defs. Mot. for Recons., March 12, 2009, 01-md-875, Doc. 5886 at 3). While we draw no conclusions about the merit of the allegations appearing in Defendants' papers, we are satisfied that they justify broader discovery.

Additionally, Defendants have brought our attention to the fact that that Dr. Segarra filed with the Court his own internal audit of diagnoses rendered between 2003 and 2005 (Segarra Resp. to Defs. Mot. to Exclude, September 16, 2006, 01-md-875, Doc. 4536). We accept Defendants' assertion that the introduction of this internal audit also justifies a more extensive evaluation of his litigation screening process and methodology. (See Defs. Mot. for Recons., March 12, 2009, 01-md- 875, Doc. 5886 at 16).

For these reasons, we conclude from the submissions of the parties that the files of all those persons who were screened for possible litigation by Dr. Segarra or his office, consistent with Judge Robreno's February 24 Order, are "related to" MDL-875, even if the individuals involved are not parties to cases in the MDL. They are thus discoverable under Fed.R.Civ.P 26(b), and must be produced.

On the other hand, it is not the Court's role to investigate alleged fraudulent practices of Dr. Segarra. Accordingly, we have denied this motion as it pertains to matters which go beyond a consideration of the manner and methodology utilized by Dr. Segarra in the litigation screening process.

Plaintiffs, in answering Defendants' motion for reconsideration, have raised concerns regarding the consulting expert privilege. (Pls.' Resp. to Defs.' Mot. for Recons., Mar. 19, 2009, 01-md-975, Doc. 5953 at 3). Counsel representing many MDL-875 plaintiffs argued that they had retained several doctors, including Dr. Segarra, to render second opinions on medical diagnoses.

Counsel would then use these opinions as a factor in determining whether or not they would pursue that individual's claim. Plaintiffs argued that Dr. Segarra's production of these plaintiff's medical records would result in a waiver of any consulting expert protections that they might have had over these documents.

The consulting expert privilege is derived from Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(B), which states that "a party may not [ordinarily], by interrogatories or deposition, discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of litigation... and who is not expected to be called as a witness at trial." When the consulting expert privilege is properly invoked, the expert's materials are discoverable only upon "showing exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for the [opposing] party to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(B)(ii); see also Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp., 85 F.R.D. 292, 299 (E.D. Pa. 1980). Counsel for Plaintiffs contend that this discovery privilege applies to Dr. Segarra in certain, identifiable Plaintiffs' cases. Defendants claim that exceptional circumstances are present here justifying discovery of otherwise privileged materials.

It remains unclear to us, however, whether extraordinary circumstances in fact exist in these cases. Specifically, we have limited information providing the context within which we could make such a determination. Initially, we need to know the extent to which Dr. Segarra, or more specifically the patients and their lawyers, claim the privilege so we could start the process of making a more informed determination. Our Order reflects this position, and leaves open the question of the applicability of the privilege and/or the exceptions to it.

Having evaluated the arguments before us, the Court grants Union Carbide's motion to compel, within the following parameters. First, Dr. Segarra is compelled to produce his litigation screening documents. We conclude generally that they are "related to" the claims of Plaintiffs in MDL-875 who have named Dr. Segarra as a diagnosing physician.*fn3 Second, Dr. Segarra is required to provide the Court a list of lawyers that retained him as a consulting expert and the number of persons for whom he was consulted by each lawyer. Finally, we deny without prejudice the motion to compel the remaining documents called for in the Subpoena.

An appropriate Order was entered on June 25, 2009.



Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Robert E. Aaron 09-cv-63215 David Adcock 09-cv-63216 Winford L. Adcock 09-cv-63581 Donald Allen, Sr. 09-cv-63217 Wayne H. Allred 09-cv-63218 Melvin Anderson 09-cv-63583 Maxie Ray Anding 09-cv-63584 Robert E. Ard 09-cv-63219 Willie Glean Ard 09-cv-63220 Gene B. Atwood 09-cv-63221 Carlton Aultman 09-cv-63587 Mozell Aultman, Sr. 09-cv-63222 David Wayne Baggett 09-cv-63588 Lee Owen Bailey, Jr. 09-cv-63203 Tommy E. Barnes, Jr. 09-cv-63590 William M. Beard 09-cv-63208 Julius R. Beard 09-cv-63213 Earnest Beasley 09-cv-63591 Jimmie L. Bevis 09-cv-63193 Terry Lee Biglan 09-cv-63196 James Johnny Bishop 09-cv-63191 George Bounds 09-cv-63194 C.N. Boykin 09-cv-63594 Buren Dale Boyles 09-cv-63595 George Boyte 09-cv-63596 Clinton Brady 08-cv-87071-ER Fred Brent 09-cv-63597 Donnie C. Brewer 09-cv-63598 Harvey E. Broom 08-cv-87069-ER Isaac Brown 09-cv-63291 Randy K. Brown 09-cv-63292

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Kenneth M. Brown 09-cv-63207 James Lavern Brown 09-cv-63211 Billy G. Brown 09-cv-63693 Estelle Ruth Brown as Representative of 09-cv-63601

The Estate of Claude Brown, Jr.

Thomas Brown, Jr. 09-cv-63567 William E. Brownell 09-cv-63011 Harmon J. Bryant 09-cv-63204 Herbert Buckley 09-cv-63195 James Donald Burkhalter 09-cv-63568 Daniel G. Burrow 09-cv-63570 Michael Bustin 09-cv-63571 Randy Byrd 09-cv-63188 Rex B. Byrd 09-cv-63190 Gary R. Byrd 09-cv-63572 Jon Campbell 09-cv-63146 Charles R. Campbell 09-cv-63573 Douglas E. Campbell 09-cv-63574 Paul Carney 09-cv-63144 Henry S. Carr 09-cv-63145 John Howard Carruth 09-cv-63575 Ollie Mae Carter as Representative of 09-cv-63694

The Estate of Jessie L. Carter

Jerry W. Cavin 09-cv-63139 Alford B. Chapman 09-cv-63141 Robert W. Clark 09-cv-63579 Thomas A. Clark 09-cv-63580 Braxton Clark 09-cv-63577 Colin R. Clark 09-cv-63578 Herman Collins 09-cv-63143

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

George B. Collins 09-cv-63278 Roderick Wayne Collins 09-cv-63279 Danny Conn 09-cv-63131 Charles T. Cook 09-cv-63132 Thomas Cooley 09-cv-63280 Jerry L. & Abby Cothern 09-cv-63281 Charles L. Coulter 09-cv-63133 Robert L. Cowart 09-cv-63137 Joseph Crawford 08-cv-87080-ER Henrietta Cummings, Individually, as 09-cv-63283

Representative of The Estate of John

Cummings, and On Behalf of All Known and Unknown Wrongful Defendant

Beneficiaries of John Cummings James Edward Cupit 09-cv-63135 Concie Curtis, III 09-cv-63138 David Daley 09-cv-63173 Willie Lee Daniels 08-cv-87068-ER Teresa Darty as Representative of The 09-cv-63690

Estate of Charles Edward Darty, Sr.

Dan Mack Daughdrill 08-cv-87081-ER Terry W. Davis 09-cv-63285 James Dearman 09-cv-63286 Kenneth L. Dearman 09-cv-63287 Rolland Dearman 08-cv-87070-ER Garner Delk 09-cv-63288 George D. Dixon 08-cv-87077-ER Newt Donald 09-cv-63264

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Willard Donald 09-cv-63265 Dale Donaldson 09-cv-63172 Kenneth A. DuBose 09-cv-63266 Darrius P. Dunigan 09-cv-63267 Jerry L. Dunigan 09-cv-63176 Vandiver Dunn 09-cv-63174 James Lowrey Dunn 09-cv-63268 Eugene F. Dvorak 09-cv-63175 Sherman Easterling 09-cv-63153 Douglas Echols 09-cv-63154 Charles Echols 09-cv-63157 Rickey Ellzey 09-cv-63270 Louie T Emler 08-cv-87084-ER Robert W. Emler, Sr. 09-cv-63271 John Eubanks 09-cv-63272 Donnie E. Evans 09-cv-63155 Bennie Jake Evans 09-cv-63156 Shirley A. Ezell, Individually, as 09-cv-63017

Representative of The Estate of Elbert C. Ezell, and On Behalf of All Known and

Unknown Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Elbert C. Ezell Kenneth Fairchild 09-cv-63160 Bill Fairley 09-cv-63159 Lee Farmer 09-cv-63274 Johnny W. Faust 08-cv-85984-ER Charles Fedrick, Sr. 09-cv-63275 Joe Feduccia 09-cv-63276

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Turner Floyd 09-cv-63161 Kendall Floyd 09-cv-63277 Leonard W. Foster 09-cv-63164 Miles D. Fountain 09-cv-63163 Michael V. Fountain Sr. 09-cv-63162 Sidney R. Foxworth 09-cv-63252 Larry M. Freeman 09-cv-63251 Charles Gardner 09-cv-63050 Robert Wayne Gardner 09-cv-63250 Richard G. Gatlin 09-cv-63249 Bobby L. Gibson 09-cv-63049 Authur Gilmore 09-cv-63048 Grover Audell Goldman 09-cv-63046 Stanley L. Goode 09-cv-63248 Kenneth Graham 09-cv-63045 David Grantham 09-cv-63044 Ted Justin Graves 09-cv-63043 Billy R. Green 09-cv-63247 Robert E. Green 09-cv-63245 Stephen C. Greene 09-cv-63244 Rudolph Gregory 09-cv-63042 Jerrell J. Gunter 09-cv-63041 Ansler Dale Hall 09-cv-63069 Charles Hamrick, Sr. 09-cv-63068 James Hargon 09-cv-63241 James E. Harris 09-cv-63067 Willie James Harris 09-cv-63239 Curtis Harris 09-cv-63240 Thad Harvey 09-cv-63064 Jerry W. Hayles 09-cv-63233

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Isaac Haynes 09-cv-63063 Cecil Heathcock 09-cv-63232 Nolan Heathcock 09-cv-63688 John Heidel 09-cv-63061 George Henderson 09-cv-63231 James V. Herrington 09-cv-63229 Don F. Herrington 09-cv-63230 Tony Herrington 09-cv-63228 Thurman R. Hitson 09-cv-63263 W.C. Hodge 09-cv-63262 Richard Hodges 09-cv-63060 Charles Edward Holifield 09-cv-63059 James Hollingshead 09-cv-63261 Melvin Hollingsworth 09-cv-63259 Billy R. Hollingsworth 09-cv-63260 George H. Hollomon 09-cv-63258 William L. Holloway 09-cv-63058 Donald W. Holmes 09-cv-63057 Charles Hoover 09-cv-63257 Johnny Howard 09-cv-63055 Malcolm Paul Howse 09-cv-63056 Ompy L. Hudson, III 09-cv-63054 Douglas Huff 09-cv-63256 Ernest Wayne Hutto 09-cv-63052 Thomas Larry Hutto 09-cv-63254 Thomas E. Hutto 09-cv-63255 Audrey Nell Ingle Individually and as 09-cv-63695

Representative of The Estate of W.C. Ingle, Deceased

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket# Larry E. Jackson 09-cv-63224 Leroy Jackson 09-cv-63225 Jackson P. Jefcoat 09-cv-63226 Jimmy D. Jernigan 09-cv-63227 Paul Bedford Johnson 09-cv-63180 Judith Richardson, Individually, as 09-cv-63005

Representative of The Estate of Troyce Johnson, Deceased, and On Behalf of All Known and Unknown Wrongful Death

Beneficiaries of Troyce Johnson, Deceased1:08-cv-00842 Roland Johnson, Jr. 09-cv-63237 James B. Jones 09-cv-63235 Robert E. Jordan 09-cv-63182 Michael H. Jordan 09-cv-63602 John E. Keyes 09-cv-63603 Joe Keyes 09-cv-63202 Kenneth Kirkendall, Sr. 09-cv-63605 Dewayne Kirkley 09-cv-63606 Plummer Kittrell 09-cv-63179 Billy Ray Knight 09-cv-63607 Tommy J. Knotts, Sr. 09-cv-63200 Howard Lambert 09-cv-63689 Ralph W. Lambert 09-cv-63608 Henry E. Landrum 09-cv-63609 Willis F. Langley 09-cv-63165 Michael R. Lee 09-cv-63166

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Edward J. Leggett 09-cv-63610 Kenneth D. Leggett 09-cv-63167 Colon R. Leonard, Jr. 09-cv-63168 William Lewis, Sr. 09-cv-63611 Vanessa Lindsey as Representative of 09-cv-63691

The Estate of Curtis Lindsey1:08-cv-01254 Daniel Livingston 08-cv-85987-ER Robert Junior Lofton 09-cv-63170 Archie A. Lord Sr. 08-cv-87030-ER Winston Madison 09-cv-63090 James G. Magee 09-cv-63089 Bobby F. Maples 09-cv-63613 Keith Mason 09-cv-63088 Kenneth Mayhugh, Jr. 09-cv-63086 Lucious McCaffrey 09-cv-63615 Roger W. McCaffrey 09-cv-63616 Daniel McCarty 09-cv-63617 Alfred McDonald 09-cv-63618 Ben F. McDonald 09-cv-63084 Mark McFarland 09-cv-63082 John W. McFarland 09-cv-63083 Charles McGee 09-cv-63619 Ronnie McGill 09-cv-63081 William R. McGraw 09-cv-63620 Thomas A. McKenzie 09-cv-63080 Delton Alford McKinney 09-cv-63621 Clifford McLain 09-cv-63079 Charles Irvin McLain 09-cv-63622

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Robert D. McLain 09-cv-63078 Jake W. McLain 09-cv-63109 James Ray McManus 09-cv-63623 Ralph T. McPhail 08-cv-87048-ER Loranzie Miller 09-cv-63077 Michael D. Miller 09-cv-63076 Bobby R. Mills 09-cv-63075 Owen L. Mills 09-cv-63624 Bobby W. Mire, Sr. 09-cv-63074 Dennis G. Moak 09-cv-63073 William Leon Moore 09-cv-63626 Willie E. Moore 09-cv-63072 Otis L. Morgan 09-cv-63627 Robert E. Morris 09-cv-63110 Neena Mosley, Individually, as 09-cv-63692

Representative of The Estate of Lee George Mosley, and On Behalf of All Known and Unknown Wrongful

Defendant Beneficiaries of Lee George

Mosley Vincent Motley 09-cv-63071 Eliel K Mounteer, Sr. 08-cv-87073-ER Hugh W. Mullins 09-cv-63070 Bobby Murray, Sr. 09-cv-63628 Jimmy L. Nations 09-cv-63183 James Nelson 09-cv-63184 Isaac Newell 09-cv-63185

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Joseph Newsom 08-cv-87031-ER Lonnie Newsom 08-cv-87076-ER Billy D. Nichols 09-cv-63630 Cecil J. Nickey 09-cv-63186 Shelby Nugent 09-cv-63631 Gary L. Odom 09-cv-63187 Rickey L. Oliver 09-cv-63632 Gene W. Pacey 09-cv-63633 Morgan T. Palmer 09-cv-63148 Joe L. Palmer 09-cv-63149 Jeffrey B. Parker 09-cv-63634 Phillip Lynn Parnell 09-cv-63635 William H. Peak 09-cv-63100 Clifton A. Perkins 09-cv-63636 Frazier M. Phillips 09-cv-63099 Ted L. Piner 08-cv-87078-ER Alfred J. Pittman 09-cv-63637 Patricia Gayle Pitts, Individually, as 09-cv-63009

Representative of The Estate of Homer Earl Pitts, and On Behalf of All Known and Unknown Wrongful Death

Beneficiaries of Homer Earl Pitts Michael C. Pitts 09-cv-63638 Vandol Wayne "V.W. " Pitts 09-cv-63640 Luther Pitts 09-cv-63098 Sam Pitts 09-cv-63639 Ernest Plumer 09-cv-63097

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Brandon Kaye Polk 08-cv-85986-ER Dale Polk 08-cv-85985-ER Carl O. Porter 09-cv-63641 William Hinton Powell 09-cv-63095 Herbert K. Powell 09-cv-63096 Albert Preston 09-cv-63093 George R. Price 09-cv-63092 Gary L. Price 09-cv-63642 Charlie W. Prine 09-cv-63696 Billy Quick 09-cv-63201 Jackie D. Ramage 09-cv-63107 Ray C. Rawls 08-cv-87075-ER William Steve Reed 09-cv-63643 James D. Reid 09-cv-63106 Harvey Richard Revette, Jr. 09-cv-63644 Charles L. Rigney, Jr. 09-cv-63645 Pearl Lavern Robbins 09-cv-63105 Donald Robbins, Sr. 09-cv-63646 Jimmy Roberts 09-cv-63647 Johnny W. Roberts 09-cv-63648 Julius E. Rodgers 09-cv-63649 Tommy Rollins 09-cv-63103 Larry Jessie Rollins 09-cv-63104 David Clinton Rollins 09-cv-63650 Carl A. Runnels 09-cv-63102 Mitchell R. Rushing 09-cv-63101 Larry Russell 09-cv-63150 William H. Russell 09-cv-63651 David P. Russell 09-cv-63152 Billy Joe Rutland 09-cv-63652

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Charles David Sanders 09-cv-63039 Aaron Sasser, Jr. 09-cv-63038 James M. Saul 09-cv-63037 Tom M. Saul, Jr. 09-cv-63036 Arthur L. Scarbrough 09-cv-63653 Jesse James Short 09-cv-63035 Thomas E. Simmons 09-cv-63034 Gary B. Sims 09-cv-63654

John W. Sims, Sr. 09-cv-63655 Charles C. Smith 09-cv-63031 Charles Smith 09-cv-63032 Ervin Smith 09-cv-63656 Mark Smith 09-cv-63657 Willis T. Smith 09-cv-63659 Kelcie Dale Smith 09-cv-63029 Charles R.Smith 09-cv-63030 Cleophus Smith 08-cv-87032-ER Elmer H. Smith & Lynda Smith 09-cv-63697 Vince Edward Smith 09-cv-63658 Joe Smith, Jr. 09-cv-63028 Darrell D. Smith, Sr. 09-cv-63027 James C. Speights 09-cv-63660 George Ross Spence 09-cv-63026 Bobby Spiars 09-cv-63661 Joseph Spiers 09-cv-63025 Joseph Spradley 09-cv-63024 Charlie A. Stampley 09-cv-63663 David Foster Stanley 09-cv-63664

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Joe Stephens 09-cv-63023 Timothy L. Stewart 09-cv-63022 Walter E. Stinson 09-cv-63021 William J. Street 09-cv-63665 Melton L. Strickland 09-cv-63666 Corbit Sullivan 09-cv-63020 Dodd Mitchell Sykes 09-cv-63019 Louis Tageant 09-cv-63667 Edward Tanner, Jr. 09-cv-63668 William A. Tatum 09-cv-63117 Leroy Terrell 09-cv-63114 Joe R. Thompson 09-cv-63113 Harold D. Thornton 09-cv-63669 Lester Leroy Toney 09-cv-63112 Larry W. Townsend 09-cv-63670 William Clyde Tucker 09-cv-63671 James M. Turner 09-cv-63111 Dewey Wayne Upshaw 09-cv-63672 Jerry Upshaw 09-cv-63673 Joel P. Upton 09-cv-63199 Kenneth Usry 09-cv-63198 Robert Earl Wade 09-cv-63674 Billy J. Wagley 09-cv-63675 James C. Wallace 09-cv-63129 Terry Wallace 08-cv-87074-ER James R. Walley 09-cv-63126 Henry Ward, Jr. 09-cv-63127 Jerry L. Warnock 09-cv-63125 Ted Watkins 09-cv-63124 James E. Watts 09-cv-63123

Case Style Plaintiff Eastern Dist of PA Docket#

Johnny R. Weeks 09-cv-63676 Freddie Weir, Jr. 09-cv-63677 Bobby G. Wells, Sr. 09-cv-63678 Dalton L. West 09-cv-63680 Thomas E. West 09-cv-63681 Larry James White 09-cv-63683 J.B. White, Jr. 09-cv-63120 James E. White, Jr. 09-cv-63684 Mathyngale "Buck" Williams 09-cv-63118 David Griffin Williams 09-cv-63119 Peter Wise 09-cv-63698 John D. Yelverton, Jr. 09-cv-63197

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.