IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
June 12, 2009
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
TED KARKUS, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gene E.K. Pratter United States District Judge
AND NOW this 12th day of June 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
1) Plaintiff Quigley Corporation's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED;
2) The imposition of a "standstill" or status quo order as set forth in the Court's Order of May 29, 2009 (Doc. No. 6) is hereby LIFTED;
3) The service of the Special Master(s) authorized by the Court's May 29, 2009 (Doc. No. 6) and June 2, 2009 (Doc. No.8) Orders shall now cease, and the Special Master(s) shall promptly submit his or their statements for services rendered; and
4) The Court will issue a subsequent order concerning further scheduling in connection with this litigation.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.