Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michell v. Anthony

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


June 4, 2009

DOUGLAS MICHELL, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY MICHAEL ANTHONY FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS AS MCM CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS AS BLEAKER STREET CONSTRUCTION, APPELLEES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8009, the Brief for Appellant Douglas Mitchell was due on May 20, 2009. See (doc. no. 1) ("Appellant Brief due by 5/20/2009"). In light of Appellant's failure to file his Brief, the Court hereby issues this Rule to Show Why the Appeal Should Not be Dismissed. See Bankruptcy Rule 8001(a) ("An appellant's failure to take any step other than timely filing a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground only for such action as the district court or bankruptcy appellate panel deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal."). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before June 25, 2009, Appellant shall file his Response to Rule to Show Cause setting forth any good cause or reasons why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

20090604

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.