IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 20, 2009
SULZER MEDICA USA, INC., ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Barclay Surrick, J.
AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants Sulzer Medica, Inc., Centerpulse, Inc., and Zimmer Holdings, Inc., for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46) and Plaintiff Nils Johannessen's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Zimmer's Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Sulzer Medica USA, Inc., and Centerpulse USA, Inc. (Doc. No. 47), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is DENIED.
3. The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 37) is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.