Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Young v. Diguglielmo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 7, 2009

ALBERT A. YOUNG, PETITIONER,
v.
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner has filed 12 objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell. Each objection is essentially a restatement of the basis of petitioner's claims for relief in his habeas corpus petition.

Each claim in that petition has been carefully, and in my opinion, correctly addressed by the Magistrate Judge in her thorough 38-page Report and Recommendation.

Petitioner has also failed to make any substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability, since there has been no substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2009.

20090507

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.