Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 6, 2009

BRO-TECH CORPORATION T/A THE PUROLITE COMPANY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THERMAX, INC. D/B/A THERMAX USA LTD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cynthia M. Rufe, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of May 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion For An Order Protecting Confidential Information [Doc. No. 468], and Defendant Thermax, Inc.'s Response [Doc. No. 469], and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; it is granted in that National Economic Research Associates agents Phillip Beutel and Christine Meyer remain bound by the terms of the confidentiality agreements they entered into in the above-captioned action, but denied in that this Court declines to render further rulings as to the applicability of the confidentiality agreements established herein to the related action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, National Economic Research Associates v. Purolite "C" Corporation d/b/a The Purolite Company, No. 08-Civ-07600 (Lynch, J.).

It is so ORDERED.

20090506

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.